Home / community clinic, Geneva, Switzerland
Dietary sodium-to-potassium balance audit + whole-food swap plan — Geneva, Switzerland.
No honesty-limit caveat needed: confirmed directly from PubMed's own record (via NCBI eutils, PMID 23558164) that Nancy J. Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $200 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- Proof3-day sodium + potassium intake estimate with the Na:K ratio recorded vs WHO targets + 2–3 concrete whole-food swaps (affordable local potassium sources) + any kidney-disease / potassium-medication / restricted-diet flag routed to a clinician or renal dietitian
- Open until2026-12-08
- Levelentry
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
No honesty-limit caveat needed: confirmed directly from PubMed's own record (via NCBI eutils, PMID 23558164) that Nancy J. Aburto, first author of this standard's own second citation ('Effect of increased potassium intake on cardiovascular risk factors and disease: systematic review and meta-analyses,' BMJ 2013), is affiliated with the Nutrition Policy and Scientific Advice Unit, Department of Nutrition for Health and Development, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland -- a direct, named-author-institution match sourced from the paper's own PubMed record, and the same organization whose own sodium/potassium guidance this standard directly cites as its third source. Distinct from the existing national (generic telehealth framing), Memphis (that region's own Stroke Belt health-disparity stakes), and Atlanta (CDC, the NHANES III citation's own federal survey origin) tiles -- Geneva is this standard's own second citation's first author's institution, and simultaneously the WHO's own headquarters, a fourth distinct category.
Fund it for $200. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Bring
- a 3-day food log or meal photos
- food-label sodium (mg) values + a potassium reference chart for whole foods (greens, legumes, potatoes, avocado, banana, yogurt)
- note on any diagnosed kidney disease (CKD) or potassium-affecting medication (ACE inhibitor, ARB, potassium-sparing diuretic, potassium supplement)
- note on any clinician-directed sodium- or potassium-restricted diet
Steps
- 1. Ask up front about diagnosed chronic kidney disease, reduced kidney function, a potassium-affecting medication (ACE inhibitor, ARB, potassium-sparing diuretic, potassium supplement), or a clinician-directed sodium/potassium-restricted diet; if ANY is present -> do NOT coach potassium loading and route to a clinician or renal dietitian before any change (raising potassium can be dangerous with impaired kidney function or these medications).
- 2. Log 3 days of food; estimate daily sodium from labels/packaging (mg) and daily potassium from a whole-food potassium reference (leafy greens, beans/legumes, potatoes/sweet potatoes, avocado, banana, yogurt).
- 3. Compute each day's sodium-to-potassium ratio and compare daily sodium to <2 g/day and potassium to ≥3.5 g/day (WHO) as coached context, not a prescription; note the biggest sodium sources (usually processed/packaged foods, restaurant meals, condiments).
- 4. Identify the two or three highest-leverage swaps — reduce a top processed-sodium source AND add a specific whole-food potassium source — as a real, concrete change, not a generic 'eat less salt'.
- 5. Record the 3-day sodium total, potassium total, the Na:K ratio, the named swaps, and any kidney/medication context; sign. Route any CKD / medication / restricted-diet flag to a clinician or renal dietitian.
What counts as done
- 3-day sodium (mg) and potassium (mg) intake estimated and the sodium-to-potassium ratio recorded
- Daily sodium and potassium compared to WHO targets (<2 g/day sodium, ≥3.5 g/day potassium) as coached context, not a prescription
- Two-to-three concrete whole-food swaps recorded (reduce a top processed-sodium source + add a named, affordable potassium-rich whole food: beans, greens, sweet potato, banana)
- Any chronic kidney disease, potassium-affecting medication, or clinician-restricted diet routed to a clinician or renal dietitian, with the referral recorded
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1788978660109_ejcnmwh","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1788978660109_ejcnmwh