Comanche facilities department, Comanche County, TX (desk compilation of this town’s public-lot canopy and stormwater sites)
Comanche’s public-lot canopy and stormwater program, one season’s results.
Comanche now has island tree plantings, low-corner bioretention cells and shade-versus-sun pavement readings at more than one public lot, and nobody has Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $130 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- Proofcompiled table + one-page summary naming the next lot + delivery record
- Open until2026-10-13
- Levelintermediate
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
Comanche now has island tree plantings, low-corner bioretention cells and shade-versus-sun pavement readings at more than one public lot, and nobody has compiled them into one record the facilities or public works department can use to decide which public lot gets the program next.
Fund it for $130. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Steps
- 1. Gather the season’s island-tree establishment records, bioretention inlet-clearing records, and shade-versus-sun temperature comparisons from every public lot in this town carrying the program.
- 2. Compile the tree survival count, the bioretention cell’s clear/functioning status, and the average shaded-versus-sun temperature difference into one table.
- 3. Write a one-page summary naming which public lot the program should reach next, based on the town’s remaining under-canopied lots.
- 4. Deliver the report to the town’s facilities or public works department.
What counts as done
- Compiled table covering every public-lot site in this town carrying the program this season
- One-page summary naming a specific next public lot for the program
- Confirmation that every number in the report is drawn directly from that season’s site records, never invented or estimated
- Delivery record showing the report reached the town’s facilities or public works department
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
The standard this serves
Urban Canopy. Urban canopy is the layer of leaves over a city, and it is infrastructure as surely as the pipes below the street: shade that cools a block in a heat wave, roots that drink a storm. The i-Tree protocol turns it into something you can count, tree by tree, so a city knows what it has and what it is losing. Mastery looks like a person who can read a whole street's trees at a walk. This packet is a piece of that census: a few trees observed carefully and recorded where the record counts.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1789309745058_jbat5pt","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1789309745058_jbat5pt