Home, 3-day log with label reading, Burlington, VT
3-day added-sugar audit (AHA limits) — Burlington, VT.
HONESTY LIMIT stated directly: this standard's own foundational AHA scientific-statement citation (Johnson RK et al. Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $240 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- Proof3 days logged with added sugar separated from intrinsic sugar + average added-sugar g/day vs the AHA limits + top added-sugar sources identified
- Open until2026-10-13
- Levelentry
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
HONESTY LIMIT stated directly: this standard's own foundational AHA scientific-statement citation (Johnson RK et al. Circulation. 2009;120(11):1011-1020, PMID 19704096 -- the direct source of this standard's own 25 g/day women, 36 g/day men limits) has no affiliation listed on its own PubMed record (confirmed via NCBI eutils). A more recent 2016 paper by the same lead author (Johnson RK, Am J Public Health, PMID 27285275) confirms her institution as the Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Vermont, Burlington -- this connects to the citation's own lead author's institution from a nearby-year paper, not a confirmed 2009-era affiliation independently verified. Distinct from the existing Miami (national baseline), Dallas (AHA, the standard's own issuing organization), Washington DC (HHS, the standard's own named DGA co-source), and Geneva (WHO, a related but not directly-named global guideline body) tiles -- Burlington is this standard's own foundational citation's own lead author's confirmed institution, a fifth distinct category.
Fund it for $240. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Bring
- 3-day food log or validated app distinguishing added vs intrinsic sugar
- label-reading for packaged foods
- portion scale or labeled servings
Steps
- 1. Log 3 representative days, separating added sugars (from labels/recipes) from naturally occurring sugars in whole fruit/dairy.
- 2. Sum added sugar grams per day and average.
- 3. Compare to the AHA limits (25 g women / 36 g men) and the <10%-of-calories guide.
- 4. Identify the top added-sugar sources (sweet drinks are usually first).
- 5. Propose swaps starting with sugar-sweetened beverages.
- 6. Attach the log; record average added sugar g/day and the top sources; sign it.
What counts as done
- 3 representative days logged, added sugar separated from naturally occurring sugar
- Average added-sugar g/day computed against the AHA limits
- Top added-sugar sources identified (sweet drinks first)
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1789317023010_1iwo3k6","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1789317023010_1iwo3k6